Coalitional manipulations in a bankruptcy problem

نویسندگان

چکیده

برای دانلود رایگان متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید

اگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید

منابع مشابه

Erratum: "bankruptcy Rules and Coalitional Manipulation"

In this paper, we study the immunity of bankruptcy rules to manipulation via merging or splitting agents’ claims. We focus on the TAL-family of bankruptcy rules (MorenoTernero & Villar, 2006), a one-parameter family encompassing three classical rules: the Talmud (T ) rule, the constrained equal-awards (A) rule and the constrained equal-losses (L) rule. We show that all rules within the TAL-fami...

متن کامل

Coalitional Manipulations and Generalized Proportional Rules∗

In a unified framework of allocation problems with at least three entities (or agents), we show that “generalized proportional rules” are the only rules that are robust to coalitional manipulations. We characterize proportional rules imposing in addition efficiency, dummy, and nonnegativity. Coalitional manipulations are considered both in the environment without any restriction on coalition fo...

متن کامل

A coalitional procedure leading to a family of bankruptcy rules

We provide a general coalitional procedure that characterizes a family of rules for bankruptcy problems inspired by the Talmud.

متن کامل

Coalitional Permutation Manipulations in the Gale-Shapley Algorithm

In this paper, we consider permutation manipulations by any subset of women in the Gale-Shapley algorithm. This paper is motivated by the college admissions process in China. Our results also answer an open problem on what can be achieved by permutation manipulations. We present an efficient algorithm to find a strategy profile such that the induced matching is stable and Pareto-optimal while t...

متن کامل

Restoring a Fish Stock: A Dynamic Bankruptcy Problem

Total Allowable Catch (TAC)-regulating schemes have been introduced in most fisheries. TAC distribution following the Proportional Rule, based on historical catches, implies that harvesters or vessel groups that have captured more in the past and contributed to overfishing are getting larger quotas than groups that have contributed less to overfishing. In contrast to this rule, a more egalitari...

متن کامل

ذخیره در منابع من


  با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید

ژورنال

عنوان ژورنال: Review of Economic Design

سال: 1999

ISSN: 1434-4742,1434-4750

DOI: 10.1007/s100580050037